Google
 

View Poll Results: TNA or WWE?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • TNA

    9 36.00%
  • WWE

    15 60.00%
  • Don't Like Wrestling

    1 4.00%
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: TNA or WWE?

  1. Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,652

    TNA or WWE?

    Just a simple poll of wrestling fans.
    OUR NEW AND EASY WAY TO ACCESS TV AND SPORT STREAMS
    WWW.TASS.TV


    MONDAY MONDAY, SO GOOD TO ME

  2. Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    8,523

    I really dont like wwe or TNA....

    but if I had to pick.. Id say TNA b.c its new.. Its more realistic and better story lines.

    WWE is the same old thing over and over again.

    the only thing i like about WWE is Wrestle Mania and that's about it.

    Other than that I dont care.

    I think when WCW was around and ECW is when WWE aka WWF was at its best b.c they had to compete with all the other organizations each week like WCW. ECW was really small and they didnt have to worry about.. but WCW with Ted Turner behind them and his Billions of $$$.

    but it made WWE better .. Ill never forget the Austin and Vince Rivarly.. It was so funny.

    and DX... and Austin 316 you just got your ass kicked.. I think I have the numbers correct.

    Anyways.. TNA is sorta like MMA they have mouth pieces in and its more realistic with the octagon...

    I mean TNA took WWE main dude Kurt Angle and now they have Mick Foley who is a Legend in Wrestling.

    They have Big Pappa Pump and Sting.. Sting would never go to WWE.....

    I mean WWE is all OLD OLD people.. I know they are pushing the 4th Generation Superstars with Randy Orton and others b.c Shawn Micheal's and HHH is are to old now and Brock Lesnar is out of WWE and in UFC...and Dwayne the ROCK Johnson is now in the movies. I dunno TNA is just getting bigger and bigger and WWE can go no further IMO.

    but I dunno WWE is just... Too.. I dunno not as good as it used to be..

    now they have this smack down and heavy weight champ and then WWE champ.

    it was just better when there was 1 Champ and 1 intercontinental Champ.

    That was the good ole days.

    Anyways that's just how I feel.
    If you have pay pal you can use it to be paid and activated and watching streams in a matter of minutes. Simply contact our reseller on MSN Messenger or Windows Messenger or LIVE messenger CHAT
    dslchommme1@hotmail.com Contact the reseller on the CHAT ASAP

    best to use windows or msn or live messenger. We try to have a reseller online to assist you nearly 24 hours a day 7 days a week to help you pay and get activated instantly

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    22

    WWE is a better product, TNA hasn't been good in a few years now.

  4. Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    87

    At the moment, neither company is doing a good job.

    WWE is stuck at the same storyline for years now ... it's always Orton against HHH or Cena. The problem here seems to be that they don't want to build up too many big stars, but right now they only have one good heel and not many more good babyfaces, leading to the same matches over and over again.

    As far as TNA goes ... the show is in a downward spiral for some weeks now. Looks like the stories behind the scene effect the product.

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    22

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFalcon View Post
    At the moment, neither company is doing a good job.

    WWE is stuck at the same storyline for years now ... it's always Orton against HHH or Cena. The problem here seems to be that they don't want to build up too many big stars, but right now they only have one good heel and not many more good babyfaces, leading to the same matches over and over again.

    As far as TNA goes ... the show is in a downward spiral for some weeks now. Looks like the stories behind the scene effect the product.
    You can thank Russo.

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    87

    Quote Originally Posted by VaderTime View Post
    You can thank Russo.
    Not only Russo ... it the whole Jarrett, Carter, Angle powerstruggle combined with Jarrett not even being there anymore, after the Karen Angle story.

    They have to find a solution soon, else the ratings will suffer and that would be bad.

  7. Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    22

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFalcon View Post
    Not only Russo ... it the whole Jarrett, Carter, Angle powerstruggle combined with Jarrett not even being there anymore, after the Karen Angle story.

    They have to find a solution soon, else the ratings will suffer and that would be bad.
    speaking of JJ, i saw him attack Hogan in, i forget exactly which Puro Jap organization it was... i'll find the video.

    I guess that means the dirt-sheets were, some what accurate about Jarrett getting bought out possibly by Dixie Carter.

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    134

    Quote Originally Posted by sportsfan101 View Post
    entertainment and story wise - wwe
    hall of fame wrestlers and wrestling - tna

    lately, not really watching neither of dem...
    but watch ufc or mma a lot ...THATS SOMETHING CRACKS ME UP!!
    lol i agree with u with the Entertainment & storylines part of the WWE

    but the wrestling part of the TNA are u kidding? i cant even stand TNA for 1 min its just soo annoying they dont know how to dliver the Product.. and everytime i try to watch TNA all i hear crowd chants is "FIRE RUSSO" "FIRE RUSSO" "FIRE RUSSO" "FIRE RUSSO"

  9. Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,652

    Most of all your comments are just perfect to hear....All in all Wrestling will never be the same as the old skool times as we all know. But WWE have really worked hard trying to keep our chins up to enjoy what they have got to offer and still till this date I'm enjoying the show "well" only RAW and PPV's which I've always enjoyed since I ever first watched WWE for I remember from 1997. The only problem I have in the UK that we dont have is "WWE SuperStars" show as that's a show that brings back the old skool when all superstars have it out in the same event. I mean WWE would be amazing if it could be just one brand (WWE) not with this draft crap between the three shows.. I just hope when the contract runs out in 2010 WWE will make it just one brand.

    TNA is what I call comes in one ear and comes out the other lol. TNA is good for its hardcore matches thats about it.

    Talking of hardcore... I really want WWE to bring back the hardcore belt when ECW goes in 2010 as I heard from the chat room on WWE that ECW is the next big storyline to kill of ECW for good it stars paul heyman for 2monthes.. Which I think this storyline will be fast due to Paul's contract..

    At least again WWE has something in store to provide us alot of entertainment and sad times that will be coming as ECW will be gone forever.

    I've also heard talks in forums and google search that "The Rock" could be turning up for a guest star on RAW lol. That I dont think will happen and "The Rock" will return in good time with one more fight... That will happen 100%.
    OUR NEW AND EASY WAY TO ACCESS TV AND SPORT STREAMS
    WWW.TASS.TV


    MONDAY MONDAY, SO GOOD TO ME

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    22

    I agree.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts